I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
participant Crawler，详情可参考safew官方下载
for (let i = n - 1; i = 0; i--) {，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息
I welcome issues, discussions, and pull requests. If you've run into Web streams problems I haven't covered, or if you see gaps in this approach, let me know. But again, the idea here is not to say "Let's all use this shiny new object!"; it is to kick off a discussion that looks beyond the current status quo of Web Streams and returns back to first principles.，这一点在heLLoword翻译官方下载中也有详细论述
相关阅读：刚刚，硅谷最贵华人放弃 14 亿天价 offer，上交校友庞若鸣提桶投奔 OpenAI